Commentary for Bava Batra 317:9
וכי תימא הכא נמי כגון שהוחזק כתב ידו בב"ד והא אמר רב יוסף בר מניומי אמר רב נחמן אף על פי שלא הוחזק כתב ידו בבית דין
evidence for one<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'him'. ');"><sup>32</sup></span> [in respect of a transaction that was recorded] in a deed,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' E.g., a loan for which a bond of indebtedness has been given. ');"><sup>33</sup></span> before it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The bond, i.e., the debt. ');"><sup>34</sup></span> had fallen as an inheritance to him, he is not eligible to identify his handwriting<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' He is now an interested party and is, consequently. disqualified from acting as witness. ');"><sup>35</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Batra 317:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.